| Author
|
Thread |
  |
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
we have some records by retards who don't even play in our league anymore
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:44 am |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
we have some records by retards who don't even play in our league anymore
that's still part of our history....
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:45 am |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
nah blid is incapable of managing a league. for my own sanity i am taking over.
what are you talking about
the skaven incident for one
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:45 am |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
im not familiar with that.
I vote going back to the old league.
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:50 am |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
..because of old records some of which are set by guys who aren't playing in our league anymore?
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:55 am |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
cuz retards like you and juggernaut make it not worth playing
anyways blid banned me from his league so i created my own
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:07 pm |
|
|
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
if t-man shows up and wants to join i'll give invite
i'm not playing in a league managed by blid
i'm making this league active and i'll replace managers who aren't
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:14 pm |
|
|
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
i'm not making any decisions unilaterally
.. and no blid wasn't great lol, wtf lol
he was quite apathetic and the reason our leagues were so inactive
of course you had no issues , why would u , u were inactive
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:36 pm |
|
|
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
u weren't active last season
what did u think about the dwight howard for gordon hawward trade anyways?
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:44 pm |
|
|
Fast Luck
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 22805
Location: Penis |
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
cuz retards like you and juggernaut make it not worth playing
anyways blid banned me from his league so i created my own
lol?
_________________
i zero bagged your mother
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
hassan-i-asher: majorin in takin pictures
dreamin bout wayne from catalina wine mixers
listen little friend stay outta the deep end
cuz you're less street than vampire weekend
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:55 pm |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
I was only inactive for 1/4 the season and I already explained the circumstances.
I don't have an issue with the trade. I don't really think it was that lopsided. Even if it was - just because one side clearly wins doesn't make it veto-able.
In general, in fantasy sports all trades should be allowed unless collusion can be proved or it is just downright ridiculous ex: Kevin Durant for Gordon Hayward.
For example, in my fantasy baseball league Matt Carpenter was traded for David Price and Victor Martinez. Pretty clear winner in that trade by a large margin but that does not mean it is veto-able.
That's pretty much standard across the board for all the fantasy sports leagues that I've been in and I'm in some pretty competitive leagues for decent money.
But again, if you want my opinion on the actual trade itself and not what should/shouldn't be vetoed then like I said I don't think it was very lopsided at all.
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:56 pm |
|
|
Fast Luck
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 22805
Location: Penis |
i wouldnt ban you from the league for the same reason i gave skaven a shot in the league: i want to have as many war2 players in it as possible, that's the whole point of it. i'd rather give a shot to someone from this forum and then have it not pan out than pick up some randos from realgm because, if i wanted to play with random people, i would not be playing with you guys to begin with.
_________________
i zero bagged your mother
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
hassan-i-asher: majorin in takin pictures
dreamin bout wayne from catalina wine mixers
listen little friend stay outta the deep end
cuz you're less street than vampire weekend
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 12:56 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
We have 6 signed up right now. Redballz already joined and I invited another guy in who's wanted in
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:12 pm |
|
|
Fast Luck
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 22805
Location: Penis |
well yeah and they're welcome to play but only 4 war2 players is a disappointing number. has tman disappeared? what about dakine. hmmMMmmMMM
_________________
i zero bagged your mother
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
hassan-i-asher: majorin in takin pictures
dreamin bout wayne from catalina wine mixers
listen little friend stay outta the deep end
cuz you're less street than vampire weekend
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:19 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
well yeah and they're welcome to play but only 4 war2 players is a disappointing number. has tman disappeared? what about dakine. hmmMMmmMMM
dakine has an invite and can accept it whenever... we aren't going to get 10-12 war2 players ..
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:24 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
I was only inactive for 1/4 the season and I already explained the circumstances.
I don't have an issue with the trade. I don't really think it was that lopsided. Even if it was - just because one side clearly wins doesn't make it veto-able.
In general, in fantasy sports all trades should be allowed unless collusion can be proved or it is just downright ridiculous ex: Kevin Durant for Gordon Hayward.
For example, in my fantasy baseball league Matt Carpenter was traded for David Price and Victor Martinez. Pretty clear winner in that trade by a large margin but that does not mean it is veto-able.
That's pretty much standard across the board for all the fantasy sports leagues that I've been in and I'm in some pretty competitive leagues for decent money.
But again, if you want my opinion on the actual trade itself and not what should/shouldn't be vetoed then like I said I don't think it was very lopsided at all.
i think it was a trade that the league should have voted on not an automatic unilateral decision by blid to put it through... then again our league is so retarded and inactive ..
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:26 pm |
|
|
Fast Luck
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 22805
Location: Penis |
we should invite chayliss, and get tman back
_________________
i zero bagged your mother
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
hassan-i-asher: majorin in takin pictures
dreamin bout wayne from catalina wine mixers
listen little friend stay outta the deep end
cuz you're less street than vampire weekend
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:27 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
other guys that play war2 who watch basketball
greenplastic (not sure how do get in contact with him or if he'd even play anywyas)
foonat (pretends he doesn't have time to play fantasy basketball but plays in fantasy football every year)
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:30 pm |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
I was only inactive for 1/4 the season and I already explained the circumstances.
I don't have an issue with the trade. I don't really think it was that lopsided. Even if it was - just because one side clearly wins doesn't make it veto-able.
In general, in fantasy sports all trades should be allowed unless collusion can be proved or it is just downright ridiculous ex: Kevin Durant for Gordon Hayward.
For example, in my fantasy baseball league Matt Carpenter was traded for David Price and Victor Martinez. Pretty clear winner in that trade by a large margin but that does not mean it is veto-able.
That's pretty much standard across the board for all the fantasy sports leagues that I've been in and I'm in some pretty competitive leagues for decent money.
But again, if you want my opinion on the actual trade itself and not what should/shouldn't be vetoed then like I said I don't think it was very lopsided at all.
i think it was a trade that the league should have voted on not an automatic unilateral decision by blid to put it through... then again our league is so retarded and inactive ..
Normally that's not how vetoing a trade works because anytime there is a marginal winner in a trade it's going to get vetoed. There is nothing wrong with there being a clear winner in a trade unless A) it's ridiculous or B) collusion is proved. In either circumstance, a vote isn't really necessary because it should be obvious and/or proved. The rest should go through. That's the nature of the game.
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:31 pm |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
well yeah and they're welcome to play but only 4 war2 players is a disappointing number. has tman disappeared? what about dakine. hmmMMmmMMM
Dakine join for sure. We still have 40 days to contact people so I'm sure TMAN, and Tarheel will join. That brings us 9 players with 6 of them being war2 players. We only need 1 more or 3 more (for 12). In either case, that will make it either 7 or 9 war2 players which is plenty and still maintains a competitive league.
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:33 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
i wouldnt ban you from the league for the same reason i gave skaven a shot in the league: i want to have as many war2 players in it as possible, that's the whole point of it. i'd rather give a shot to someone from this forum and then have it not pan out than pick up some randos from realgm because, if i wanted to play with random people, i would not be playing with you guys to begin with.
that wasn't the whole point. there was small chance to fill out a league with war2 players, we never have done it once or even came close.
many of them are complete failures (summoner, ideal-hero, skaven) etc.. i 'd rather have "randoms" who are active and good than those bums.
btw i don't think we've ever had random realgm posters in our league ? i invited 2 guys from a previous league who were good and i thought would bring more competitiveness to our weak league.
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:03 pm |
|
|
Fast Luck
Joined: 11 Oct 2001
Posts: 22805
Location: Penis |
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
i wouldnt ban you from the league for the same reason i gave skaven a shot in the league: i want to have as many war2 players in it as possible, that's the whole point of it. i'd rather give a shot to someone from this forum and then have it not pan out than pick up some randos from realgm because, if i wanted to play with random people, i would not be playing with you guys to begin with.
that wasn't the whole point. there was small chance to fill out a league with war2 players, we never have done it once or even came close.
many of them are complete failures (summoner, ideal-hero, skaven) etc.. i 'd rather have "randoms" who are active and good than those bums.
btw i don't think we've ever had random realgm posters in our league ? i invited 2 guys from a previous league who were good and i thought would bring more competitiveness to our weak league.
it is the whole point. my interest in beating strangers at this is zero. summoner was inactive, skaven was inactive, so in all likelihood they won't be invited back again, but im interested in trying to get war2 people in the league because that is the only reason i would play it.
_________________
i zero bagged your mother
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
hassan-i-asher: majorin in takin pictures
dreamin bout wayne from catalina wine mixers
listen little friend stay outta the deep end
cuz you're less street than vampire weekend
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:06 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
I was only inactive for 1/4 the season and I already explained the circumstances.
I don't have an issue with the trade. I don't really think it was that lopsided. Even if it was - just because one side clearly wins doesn't make it veto-able.
In general, in fantasy sports all trades should be allowed unless collusion can be proved or it is just downright ridiculous ex: Kevin Durant for Gordon Hayward.
For example, in my fantasy baseball league Matt Carpenter was traded for David Price and Victor Martinez. Pretty clear winner in that trade by a large margin but that does not mean it is veto-able.
That's pretty much standard across the board for all the fantasy sports leagues that I've been in and I'm in some pretty competitive leagues for decent money.
But again, if you want my opinion on the actual trade itself and not what should/shouldn't be vetoed then like I said I don't think it was very lopsided at all.
i think it was a trade that the league should have voted on not an automatic unilateral decision by blid to put it through... then again our league is so retarded and inactive ..
Normally that's not how vetoing a trade works because anytime there is a marginal winner in a trade it's going to get vetoed. There is nothing wrong with there being a clear winner in a trade unless A) it's ridiculous or B) collusion is proved. In either circumstance, a vote isn't really necessary because it should be obvious and/or proved. The rest should go through. That's the nature of the game.
the trade was retarded for both sides anyways... turtleman firstly could have got something much better for dwight, .. he also didn't have a particularly great free throw shooting team even without dwight, i know he had tristian thompson... so why even give him up?
secondly, the guy who got dwight howard already had good FT shooting bigs like marc gasol and didn't fit with his team well at all..
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
Last edited by Jon; on Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:11 pm |
|
|
Jon;
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 13966
|
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by Fast Luck
i wouldnt ban you from the league for the same reason i gave skaven a shot in the league: i want to have as many war2 players in it as possible, that's the whole point of it. i'd rather give a shot to someone from this forum and then have it not pan out than pick up some randos from realgm because, if i wanted to play with random people, i would not be playing with you guys to begin with.
that wasn't the whole point. there was small chance to fill out a league with war2 players, we never have done it once or even came close.
many of them are complete failures (summoner, ideal-hero, skaven) etc.. i 'd rather have "randoms" who are active and good than those bums.
btw i don't think we've ever had random realgm posters in our league ? i invited 2 guys from a previous league who were good and i thought would bring more competitiveness to our weak league.
it is the whole point. my interest in beating strangers at this is zero. summoner was inactive, skaven was inactive, so in all likelihood they won't be invited back again, but im interested in trying to get war2 people in the league because that is the only reason i would play it.
yea we get as many war2 players as possible and fill the rest with other guys we know ...
and these guys if they continue playing in our league over several seasons become not so random anymore.
_________________
"i don't have pet peeves, i have major psychotic fucking hatreds"
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:13 pm |
|
|
TheSilverPoNy
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 1319
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
quote:
Originally posted by Jon;
quote:
Originally posted by TheSilverPoNy
I was only inactive for 1/4 the season and I already explained the circumstances.
I don't have an issue with the trade. I don't really think it was that lopsided. Even if it was - just because one side clearly wins doesn't make it veto-able.
In general, in fantasy sports all trades should be allowed unless collusion can be proved or it is just downright ridiculous ex: Kevin Durant for Gordon Hayward.
For example, in my fantasy baseball league Matt Carpenter was traded for David Price and Victor Martinez. Pretty clear winner in that trade by a large margin but that does not mean it is veto-able.
That's pretty much standard across the board for all the fantasy sports leagues that I've been in and I'm in some pretty competitive leagues for decent money.
But again, if you want my opinion on the actual trade itself and not what should/shouldn't be vetoed then like I said I don't think it was very lopsided at all.
i think it was a trade that the league should have voted on not an automatic unilateral decision by blid to put it through... then again our league is so retarded and inactive ..
Normally that's not how vetoing a trade works because anytime there is a marginal winner in a trade it's going to get vetoed. There is nothing wrong with there being a clear winner in a trade unless A) it's ridiculous or B) collusion is proved. In either circumstance, a vote isn't really necessary because it should be obvious and/or proved. The rest should go through. That's the nature of the game.
the trade was retarded for both sides anyways... turtleman firstly could have got something much better for dwight, .. he also didn't have a particularly great free throw shooting team even without dwight, i know he had tristian thompson... so why even give him up?
secondly, the guy who got dwight howard already had good FT shooting bigs like marc gasol and didn't fit with his team well at all..
That isn't up for you to decide how they manage their teams. As long as they are not colluding together to destroy the integrity of the league or it isn't something outrageous like a #1 overall player for a #300 overall player it has nothing to do with you and you should stay out of it or else you run the risk of looking like a poor sport.
As a team manager, if people were pouting about me mismanaging my own team and were complaining about a trade that I made that I felt was in my own best interest and that didn't fall into either of those two categories I'd be pissed off because it is none of your business. OR if people were pouting because I made a trade that clearly improves my team.
Honestly, I don't think you have the experience of playing in many other competitive fantasy leagues if that you think that is a veto-able trade. And if you do think that should be the case OR you think it should be put to the league for a vote then I have some serious concerns about you being a commissioner.
|
|
Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:23 pm |
|
|
Warcraft Occult Forum Index
-> General Discussion
